Abstract

Review Article

The Neppe-Close triadic dimensional vortical paradigm: An invited summary

Vernon M Neppe* and Edward R Close

Published: 13 January, 2020 | Volume 3 - Issue 1 | Pages: 001-014

Physicists are generally trained in the Standard Model of Physics (SMP). This implies that they perceive and account for only 3 dimensions of space in a moment in time (3S-1t) (a 4-dimensional [4D] model). However, applying the SMP, more than fifty significant conundrums have arisen that are unexplained or incomplete. Explaining these within the SMP 4D fabric led to hypothesizing a ‘fifth force’, most recently the hypothetical ‘X17 particle’. We propose this hypothetical X17 may better be explained by a 9-dimensional model (9D) with gimmel. Our model, the Neppe-Close Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) has amplified the ‘physics’ from 4 dimensions to 9D, specifically first postulating and then further demonstrating mathematically—starting with derivations of the Cabibbo angle—that 9 dimensions must exist. Moreover, this data is empirically demonstrated because the neutron, proton and electron mass-energy-gimmel equivalence in the Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence (TRUE) as part of the TDVP model, exactly corresponds with the normalized data for the mass-energy equivalence volumetric data for these particles in the CERN Large Hadron Collider. This data shows definitively that we exist in a 9-dimensional finite, quantized, volumetric, spinning reality. This is, furthermore, embedded in an infinite continuity (9D+). Mathematically, applying this 9D+ model definitively requires an extra third component that is massless and energyless (‘gimmel’). Without gimmel, no particle in the universe would be stable. TDVP unifies nature because the same laws apply across the quantum, macro-world and cosmological reality. Our 4D experience is simply the physical component of 9D+ existence.

Summary Amplification: At all levels, there is the consistent application of a 9-Dimensional quantized finite reality embedded within an infinite continuity. The application of gimmel specifically requires applying the 9-dimensional model and is based on necessary mathematical calculations not only at the quantal level (where the fifty plus unsolved, unexplained or contradictory conundrums can be explained somewhat, and there is no longer ‘quantum weirdness’), but at the macroscale level with more gimmel in the life elements (which, additionally, are consistently all cubic multiples of 108 cubed), as well as cosmologically, where the correlations with proportionate Dark Matter and Dark Energy are overwhelming. Moreover, these 9-dimensional plus factors together with Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence (TRUE) and gimmel, allow numerous solutions that couldn’t otherwise be solved. For example, importantly, applying the simple mathematics of TRUE, we can demonstrate why gluons, while adequate in 4D, are impossible applying 9D. These solutions are simpler because we have markedly adapted George Spencer-Brown’s ‘Laws of Form’ to applying a new method of mathematical calculation, Edward Close’s ‘Calculus of Distinctions’ (COD) which recognizes quantal limits and that the nature of finite reality is quantized and volumetric. The COD includes distinguishing between content, extent, and impact. We emphasize the pioneering works of Wolfgang Pauli with his multidimensional model and his ‘Pauli Exclusion Principle’, Alfred Whitehead with ‘Process Philosophy’ and his ‘Principia Mathematica’ (with Bertrand Russell), Georg Cantor with Set Theory, and Roger Penrose with spinors and twistors. TDVP is a prime example of our broad new specialty of ‘Dimensional Biopsychophysics’ (DBP). DBP extends physics, consciousness, and the biopsychosocial to extra dimensions and applies mathematics empirically. Like Max Tegmark, we recognize the key role of mathematics as fundamental in nature, not just for application in calculation and operations.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.ijpra.1001018 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

3S-t; 9D; 9D+; 4D; Calculus of distinctions; Calculus of dimensional distinctions; Cabibbo; Cantor; Close; consciousness; Consciousness research; Continuous; Dark matter; Dark energy; Definition; Dimensional Biopsychophysics; Dimensions; Discrete; Distinctions; Diophantine equations; Entanglement; Energy; Erroneous; Framework model; Framework of gimmel; Immediacy; Infinite continuity; Infinity; Information; Krasznahorkay; Limitations; Mass; Mathematics; Misinterpretation; Neppe; Ordropy; Organic; Pauli; Pauli exclusion principle; Penrose; Periodic table; Phenomenological levels; Physics; Quantum; Quantum relative to; Relative; Relative non-locality; Restricted 3S-1t; Russell; Set theory; Shells; Space; Spencer brown; transfinite; Triadic dimensional distinction vortical paradigm; Spinors; TDVP; Tegmark; Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm; Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence (TRUE); Twistors; Valence; Volumetric; Vortices; X17 particle; Whitehead

References

  1. Halpern P. The great beyond: higher dimensions, parallel universes and the extraordinary search for a theory of everything. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.2005.
  2. Hawking S. The theory of everything. Beverly Hills: New Millennium Press. 2007.
  3. Neppe VM, Close ER. A proposed Theory of Everything that works: How the Neppe-Close Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) model provides a metaparadigm by applying nine-dimensional finite spin space, time and consciousness substrates and the transfinite embedded in the infinite producing a unified reality. IQNexus J. 2014; 16: 1-54.
  4. Pokharna SS, Bhandari N, Prajna SC. Jainism and the Theory of Everything (TOE). Transactions of International School for Jain Studies II 2 2. 2018; 1-11.
  5. Kumar M. Quantum: Einstein, Bohr and the great debate about the nature of reality. Thriplow, Cambridge: Icon Books Ltd. 2009.
  6. Einstein A. Last Update Date. Relativity and the problem of space. Series Relativity and the problem of space Retrieved Date, Access 1952 (English translation 1954) http://www.relativitybook.com/resources/Einstein_space.html.
  7. Einstein A. Relativity, the special and the general theory—a clear explanation that anyone can understand. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 2001.
  8. Minkowski H, Lorentz HA, Einstein A, Hermann W, Arnold S, et al. The principle of relativity: a collection of original memoirs: Dover. 1952.
  9. Einstein A. Relativity, the special and the general theory 15 Edition. New York: Crown Publishers. 1952.
  10. Aspect A, Grangier P, Roger G. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedanken experiment: a new violation of Bell's inequalities. Physical Review Letters. 1982; 49: 91-94.
  11. Beichler JE. The five-dimensional continuum approach to a unified field theory. J Paraphysics: 1999; 2: 101-203.
  12. Nordström G. On the energy of the gravitational field in Einstein's Theory. Verhandl. Koninkl. Ned. Akad. Wetenschap., Afdel. Natuurk, Amsterdam 26. 1918; 1201–1208.
  13. Zee A. Quantum field theory in a nutshell. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2003.
  14. Close ER, Neppe VM. The Cabibbo mixing angle and other particle physics paradoxes solved by applying the TDVP multidimensional spin model. IQNexus J. 2014; 1: 13-50.
  15. Neppe VM, Close ER. Reality begins with consciousness: a paradigm shift that works (5th Edition) Fifth Edition. Seattle: Brainvoyage.com. 2014.
  16. Neppe VM, Close ER. Reality begins with consciousness: a paradigm shift that works (First Edition) 1 Edition. Seattle: Brainvoyage.com. 2012.
  17. Neppe VM, Close ER. Applying consciousness, infinity and dimensionality creating a paradigm shift: introducing the triadic dimensional distinction vortical paradigm (TDVP). Neuroquantology. 2011; 9: 375-392.
  18. Whitehead AN. Process and reality. New York: Free Press.1978.
  19. Griffin DR. Parapsychology and philosophy: A Whiteheadian postmodern perspective. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research. 1993; 87: 217-288.
  20. Griffin DR. Reenchantment without supernaturalism: A Process philosophy of religion Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press. 2001
  21. Whitehead AN. Science and the modern world. New York: Free Press. 1953.
  22. Whitehead AN. Russell B: Principia Mathematica: volumes 1 to 3. London: Cambridge University Press. 1910.
  23. Cantor G (ed.). Contributions to the founding of the theory of transfinite numbers. New York, Dover, 1955.
  24. Brown GS. Laws of form. London: Allen and Unwin. 1969.
  25. Chalmers DJ. The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press. 1996.
  26. Chalmers DJ. Facing up to the problems of consciousness. J Consciousness Studies, University of Arizona. 1995; 2: 200-219.
  27. Shimony A. On mentality, quantum mechanics and the actualization of potentialities, in The large, the small and the human mind. Edited by Penrose R. Cambridge, U.K. Cambridge University Press. 1997; 144-160.
  28. Tegmark M. Our mathematical universe: My quest for the ultimate nature of reality. New York: Knopf. 2014.
  29. Ferguson AS. Plato's smile of light. (Part II.) The allegory of the cave (Continued). JSTOR. The Classical Quarterly 16: 1. 1922; 636164; 15–28.
  30. Platonism in the philosophy of mathematics, in Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, California. 2013. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/platonism-mathematics/; http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/platonism-mathematics/
  31. Smythies JR. The walls of Plato’s cave. Aldershot: Avebury Press.1994.
  32. Close ER, Neppe VM. The role of mathematics in investigating the nature of reality (Part 4). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 22-26.
  33. Close ER, Neppe VM. Mathematical and theoretical physics feasibility demonstration of the finite nine dimensional vortical model in fermions. Dynamic International Journal of Exceptional Creative Achievement. 2013; 1301: 1-55.
  34. Close ER, Neppe VM. Understanding the calculus of distinctions and its role in TDVP: chapter 8 IQ Nexus J. 2016; 8: 107-114.
  35. Close ER, Neppe VM. Further implications: quantized reality and applying Close’s Calculus of Distinctions versus the Calculus of Newton(Part 19). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 110-111.
  36. Close ER, Neppe VM. Close’s Calculus of Distinctions and Indications. Dynamic International Journal of Exceptional Creative Achievement In press.
  37. Close ER, Neppe VM. The Calculus of Distinctions: A workable mathematicologic model across dimensions and consciousness. Dynamic International Journal of Exceptional Creative Achievement. 1213; 1210: 2387 -2397.
  38. Baron ME. The origins of the Infinitesimal Calculus. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation. 1969.
  39. Lamb H. An elementary course in infinitesimal calculus. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press. 1924.
  40. Close ER, Neppe VM. The proton: Section 6: In: Derivation and application of TRUE quantum calculus for the analysis of quantized reality. 2020.
  41. Close ER. The calculus of dimensional distinctions, in Elements of mathematical theory of intellect (monograph). Edited by Brandin V. Moscow: Moscow Interphysica Lab. 2003; 13-20.
  42. Close ER, Neppe VM. Derivation and application of TRUE quantum calculus for the analysis of quantized reality, including empirically verifiable new approaches to mass, neutrons, protons, law of conservation of gimmel and TRUE, TDVP and Deuterium. 2020.
  43. Close ER, Neppe VM: Putting consciousness into the equations of science: the third form of reality (gimmel) and the “TRUE” units (Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence) of quantum measurement. IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 7-119.
  44. Close ER, Neppe VM. The TRUE unit: triadic rotational units of equivalence (TRUE) and the third form of reality: gimmel; applying the conveyance equation (Part 12). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 55-65.
  45. Dauben JW: Georg Cantor. His mathematics and philosophy of the iInfinite. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uiversity press. 1979.
  46. Dauben JW. Georg Cantor and the origins of Transfinite Set Theory. Scientific American. 1983; 248: 122–131.
  47. Neppe VM, Close ER. The Science of reality: Is reality even definable? How the scientific model of the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) allows for the finite and the infinite. IQ Nexus J. 2019; 11: 4-44.
  48. Neppe VM, Close ER. Does the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) alter the landscape from 4D science to 9D science? The controversy of conventional scientific materialism versus integrating multidimensionality, the infinite and consciousness. IQ Nexus J. 2018; 10: 7-46.
  49. Minkowski H. Raum und Zeit. Physikalische Zeitschrift. 1908; 10: 104–111.
  50. Neppe VM, Close ER. The gimmel pairing: Consciousness and energy and life (Part 13D). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 122-126.
  51. Close ER, Neppe VM. Speculations on the “God matrix”: The third form of reality (gimmel) and the refutation of materialism and on gluons. World Institute for Scientific Exploration (WISE) Journal. 2015; 4: 3-30.
  52. Neppe VM, Close ER. The Elusive Mystery Solved: The Gimmel of Consciousness: Section 2. In Higher consciousness outside the brain: Science and spirituality through the prism of 9-dimensional physics, gimmel and the infinite. IQ Nexus J. 2019; 11: 19-43.
  53. Neppe VM, Close ER. Higher consciousness outside the brain: Science and spirituality through the prism of 9-dimensional physics, gimmel and the infinite. IQ Nexus J. 2019; 11: 5-43.
  54. Close ER, Neppe VM. Elementary particles and units of measurement: applying the conveyance equation (Part 11). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 48-54.
  55. Neppe VM, Close ER. Wondrous gimmel: Section 8. In Integrating spirituality into science: applying the Neppe-Close Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP). IQNexus J. 2018; 10: 42-47.
  56. Neppe VM. Understanding Gimmel with Vernon Neppe. (YouTube). New Thinking Allowed. 2018; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhV96ShslU4
  57. Close ER, Neppe VM. Introductory summary perspective on TRUE and gimmel (Part 1) in Putting consciousness into the equations of science: the third form of reality (gimmel) and the “TRUE” units (Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence) of quantum measurement IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 8-15.
  58. Close ER, Neppe VM. The thirteenth conundrum: introducing an important new concept, TRUE units—Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence. IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 60-71.
  59. Close ER, Neppe VM. Why TRUE units have to be correct: the mass in the proton: re-affirming the truth of Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence. Chapter 6 IQNexus J. 2016; 8: 122; 70-96.
  60. Close ER, Neppe VM. The origin of mass: Section 5: In: Derivation and application of TRUE quantum calculus for the analysis of quantized reality. 2019.
  61. Close ER, Neppe VM. Application of TRUE analysis to the elements of the periodic table: Section 9: In: Derivation and application of TRUE quantum calculus for the analysis of quantized reality. 2020.
  62. Krasznahorkay AJ, Csatlos M, Csige L, Gulyas J, Koszta M, et al. New evidence supporting the existence of the hypothetic X17 particle. 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10459
  63. Prior R. A 'no-brainer Nobel Prize': Hungarian scientists may have found a fifth force of nature. 2019. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/11/22/world/fifth-force-of-nature-scn-trnd/index.html?__twitter_impression=true
  64. Neppe VM, Close ER. The fourteenth conundrum: Applying the proportions of Gimmel to Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence compared to the proportions of dark matter plus dark energy: Speculations in cosmology. IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 72-73.
  65. Neppe VM, Close ER: Moving to the 9-D reality and gimmel: Part 2. In Does the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) alter the landscape from 4D science to 9D science? . IQ Nexus J. 2018; 10: 16-20.
  66. Neppe VM, with Close ER. The need to refute: Why the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) entails far more than the Standard Model of Physics: 4D experience is far less than our 9D+ existence. IQNexus J. 2018; 4: 47-78.
  67. Neppe VM, Close ER: 4D science: Blindness or logic? Part 1. In Does the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) alter the landscape from 4D science to 9D science? . IQ Nexus J. 2018; 10: 9-15.
  68. Neppe VM, Close ER: The misguided, the cynics, the deniers, the scoffers and the innocent. Part 3. In: Does the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) alter the landscape from 4D science to 9D science? IQ Nexus J. 2018; 10: 21-27.
  69. Neppe VM, Close ER. Speculation versus Proof: Part 4. In: Does the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) alter the landscape from 4D science to 9D science? IQ Nexus J. 2018; 10: 28-40.
  70. Close ER, Neppe VM. Fifteen mysteries of 9 dimensions: on Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence and new directions, Part III. Neuroquantology. 2015; 13: 439-447.
  71. Neppe VM, Close ER. The Cabibbo mixing angle (CMA) derivation: Is our mathematical derivation of the Cabibbo spin mixing angle (CSMA) equivalent? IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 120-128.
  72. Figueroa-O'Farrill JM. String theory in a nutshell. 2003. http://www.strings.ph.qmw.ac.uk/WhatIs/Nutshell.html
  73. Kiritsis E. String theory in a nutshell. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2007.
  74. Schwarz P. The official string theory website: Basics. 2003. http://www.superstringtheory.com/basics/index.html and http://www.superstringtheory.com/forum
  75. Brax P. The supermoduli space of Matrix String Theory. 2011. http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/411941/files/9912103.pdf
  76. Zimmerman Jones A. Hawking and Hertog: String Theory can explain dark energy. 2006, http://physics.about.com/b/2006/06/20/hawking-hertog-string-theory-can-explain-dark-energy.htm
  77. Close ER, Neppe VM: The fifth conundrum: applying mathematical dimensional extrapolation non-specifically in our dimensional calculations to demonstrate multidimensionality. IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 34-38.
  78. Close ER, Neppe VM. The sixth conundrum: theoretical knowledge on deriving the Cabibbo angle. IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 39-40.
  79. Close ER, Neppe VM: The seventh conundrum: the mathematical derivation of the Cabibbo mixing angle in fermions. IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 41-43.
  80. Van der Schaar JP. Kaluza Klein theory. http://www-th.phys.rug.nl/~schaar/htmlreport/node12.html. 1998.
  81. Straumann N. Last Update Date. On Pauli’s invention of Non-Abelian Kaluza-Klein Theory in 1953. Series On Pauli’s invention of Non-Abelian Kaluza-Klein Theory in 1953. 2008. http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0012054v1.pdf; http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0012054v1.pdf
  82. Bailint D, Love A. Last Update Date. Kaluza-Klein theories. Series Kaluza-Klein theories Retrieved Date, Access 1987, http://www.het.brown.edu/people/danieldf/literary/eric-KKtheories.pdf; http://www.het.brown.edu/people/danieldf/literary/eric-KKtheories.pdf
  83. Wuensch D. Kaluza—Klein Theory Compendium of Quantum Physics: 2009; 1: 328–333.
  84. Straumann NO. On Pauli's invention of non-abelian Kaluza-Klein Theory in 1953. arXiv:gr-qc/0012054, 2000
  85. Rauscher EA, Targ R. The speed of thought: Investigation of a complex space-time metric to describe psychic phenomena. Journal of Scientific Exploration. 2001; 15: 3; 331-354. http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/abstracts/v15n3a2.html
  86. Massimi M. Pauli's Exclusion Principle. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 2005.
  87. Pauli W. Looking for neutrinos, nature’s ghost particles (Pauli), SmithsonianMag. 2010. (quotation0.https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/looking-for-neutrinos-natures-ghost-particles-64200742/#Wj8FCmzX0R2PscGm.99
  88. Pauli W. Wissenshaftlicher Briefwechsel (Science change), Dialectica: Springer Verlag.1999; 4.
  89. Pauli W. Naturwissenschaftliche und erkenntnistheoretische Aspekte der Ideen vom Unbewussten. Dialectica. 1954; 8: 283–301.
  90. Close ER, Neppe VM. Derivation and application of TRUE quantum calculus for the analysis of quantized reality, including empirically verifiable new approaches to mass, neutrons, protons, law of conservation of gimmel and TRUE, TDVP and Deuterium. 2019.
  91. Penrose R. Twistor Algebra. J Mathematical Phy. 1967; 8: 345-366.
  92. Penrose SR, Hameroff S. Consciousness in the universe: quantum physics, evolution, brain & mind. Cambridge: Cosmology Science Publishers. 2011.
  93. Hameroff SR. Physical reality and consciousness -- introduction. 2011. http://cognet.mit.edu/posters/Tucson3/Hameroff.Reality.html
  94. Penrose R, Rindler W. Spinors and space-time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1986.
  95. Penrose R, MacCallum MAH. Twistor theory: An approach to the quantisation of fields and space-time. Physics Report. 1973; 6: 241–315.
  96. Penrose R. Non-linear gravitons and curved twistor theory. Gen Rel Grav. 1976; 7: 31–52.
  97. Penrose R. Shadows of the mind. London: Oxford University Press. 1994.
  98. Penrose R. The road to reality: a complete guide to the laws of the universe. San Francisco: National Books.2007.
  99. Hawking S, Penrose R. The nature of space and time. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1996.
  100. Stricker SA. Holographic thermalization in [Formula: see text] super Yang-Mills theory at finite coupling. Eur Phys J C Part Fields. 74: 2727. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25814879
  101. Kostov I, Petkova VB, Serban D. Determinant Formula for the Octagon Form Factor in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory. Phys Rev Lett 122: 23; 231601. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31298890
  102. Berkovits N. Infinite tension limit of the pure spinor superstring. J High Energy Phy. 2014; 3: 17.
  103. Close ER, Neppe VM. One response to “An evaluation of TDVP” with explanations of fundamental concepts. IQ Nexus J. 2019; 10: 79-107.
  104. Neppe VM. LFAF: Lower Dimensional Feasibility, Absent Falsification linked with meaningful evolution: Part 5. In Meaningful Evolution, abiogenesis and life solved through gimmel: Translating from the infinite continuity to the discrete finite by applying the Neppe-Close Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP). IQNexus J. 2019; 11: 39-43.
  105. Neppe VM. Three fundamental models of evolution: Meaningful Evolution (ME), Darwinian Evolution (DE), Intelligent Design (ID). Part 2. In Meaningful Evolution, abiogenesis and life solved through gimmel: Translating from the infinite continuity to the discrete finite by applying the Neppe-Close Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP). IQNexus J. 2019; 11: 16-19.
  106. Neppe VM. Feasibility and falsification in science: On LFAF (YouTube). New Thinking Allowed. 2018. https://youtu.be/w3elui7unrA
  107. Neppe VM, Close ER. Interpreting science through feasibility and replicability: Extending the scientific method by applying “Lower Dimensional Feasibility, Absent Falsification” (LFAF). World Institute for Scientific Exploration (WISE) Journal. 2015; 4: 3-37.
  108. Neppe VM, Close ER. Why lower dimensional feasibility (LFAF): Application to metadimensionality Dynamic International Journal of Exceptional Creative Achievement. 2012; 1209: 2352-2360.
  109. Neppe VMC, Edward R. Indivension: A way to process the higher dimensional interface. Dynamic International Journal of Exceptional Creative Achievement. 2012; 1209: 2361-2369.
  110. Neppe VM, Close ER. Vortical Indivension: A perspective (Part 12). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 98-111.
  111. Neppe VM, Close ER. Quantum probability wave collapse or superposition is explained by vortical indivension (Part 12C). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 3; 113.
  112. Neppe VM, Close ER. The second conundrum: Falsifiability is insufficient; we need to apply feasibility as well Lower Dimensional Feasibility, Absent Falsification (LFAF) as a scientific method. IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 21-23.
  113. Oerter R. The theory of almost everything: the standard model, the unsung triumph of modern physics. New York: Person Education. 2006.
  114. Söding P. On the discovery of the gluon. Euro Phy J. 2010; 35: 3–28.
  115. Yagi K, Hatsuda T, Miake Y. Quark-Gluon Plasma: From Big Bang to Little Bang: Cambridge monographs on particle physics, nuclear physics and cosmology. (Book 23). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 2008.
  116. Singh S. Fermat's Enigma: The epic quest to solve the world's greatest mathematical problem. Notting Hill, UK: Fourth Estate, Ltd. 1997.
  117. Kleiner I. From Fermat to Wiles: Fermat's last theorem becomes a theorem. Elem Math. 2000; 55: 19-37.
  118. Close ER. Appendix B: 1965 Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, in The Book of Atma. Edited by. New York: Libra Publishers. 1977; 93-99.
  119. Aczel A/ Fermat's last theorem: unlocking the secret of an ancient mathematical problem. New York: Four Walls Eight WIndows. 1996.
  120. Neppe VM, Close ER. Speculations about gimmel Part 5. World Institute for Scientific Exploration (WISE) Journal. 2015; 4: 21-26.
  121. Close ER, Neppe VM. More questions answered on the elements, TRUE and gimmel (Part 17). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 82-102.
  122. Close ER, Neppe VM. Understanding TRUE units and gimmel as part of TDVP: chapter 7 IQ Nexus J. 2016; 8: 97-106.
  123. Close ER, Neppe VM. The Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) is valid and appropriate: The roles of neutrons and protons, particle emergence including decay and vortical spin - A response. Telicom. 2018; 30: 95-105.
  124. Beta decay. 2018; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay.
  125. Basdevant JL, Rich J, Spiro M. β decay of nuclei in Fundamentals in nuclear physics: From nuclear structure to cosmology. Edited by Basdevant JL, Rich J, Spiro M. New York. Springer. Chapter 4. 4.3.2, 202. 2005.
  126. Neppe VM, Close ER. A nutshell key perspective on the Neppe-Close “Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm” (TDVP). IQNexus J. 2016; 8: 7-80.
  127. Neppe VM, Close ER. A data analysis preliminarily validates the new hypothesis that the atom 'contains' dark matter and dark energy: Dark matter correlates with gimmel in the atomic nucleus and dark energy with gimmel in electrons. IQ Nexus J. 2016; 8: 80-96.
  128. Neppe VM, Close ER. Unified monism: linking science with spirituality in a philosophical model. Section 9: In Integrating spirituality into science: applying the Neppe-Close Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP). IQNexus J. 2018; 10: 48-51, 2018.
  129. Neppe VM, Close ER. The fifteenth conundrum: Applying the philosophical model of Unified Monism: Returning to general principles. IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 74-78.
  130. Feynman RP (ed.). The Feynman lectures on physics. USA, Addison-Wesley, 1965.
  131. Neppe VM, Close ER. Relative non-locality and the infinite, in Reality begins with consciousness: a paradigm shift that works (5th Edition). Edited by. Seattle, WA. 2014; 376-379. Brainvoyage.com
  132. Neppe VM, Close ER. The discrete finite contained in the continuous infinite: some speculations (Part 13C). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 120-122.
  133. Neppe VM, Close ER. The Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm (TDVP): The nine-dimensional finite spin metaparadigm embedded in the infinite Dynamic International Journal of Exceptional Creative Achievement. 2014; 1401: 4001-4041.
  134. Neppe VM, Pokharna SS, Close ER. The newest of the 10 psi protocols: Introducing Quantum Remote Viewing Clairvoyance: Chapter 8. In: The remarkable Besant-Leadbeater studies in Quantal Clairvoyance (quantal remote viewing) correlate profoundly with the Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence quantal models in Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm. IQ Nexus J. 2019; 11: 52-56.
  135. Neppe VM, Close ER. On Non-locality II: Quantum physics and non-locality. J Consciousness Exploration and Res. 2015; 6: 97-102.
  136. Close ER, Neppe VM. Filling in the gaps of volumetric stability (Part 18). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 103-109.
  137. Neppe V, Close ER. Beyond Physical Life How ‘TDVP’ (Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm) explains survival after bodily death. J Spiritual and Consciousness Studies. 2017; 40: 42-62.
  138. Neppe VM, Close ER. TDVP and life tracks: Speculations that fit the model (Part 13F). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 129-130.
  139. Neppe VM, Close ER. Reality begins with consciousness: Survival and life itself —Is there a how? Proceedings of 2013 Conference Academy for Spiritual and Consciousness Studies. 2013; 1-17.
  140. Neppe VM, Close ER. The Infinite: essence, life and ordropy Dynamic International Journal of Exceptional Creative Achievement. 2012; 1204: 2159-2169.
  141. Neppe VM. Building reality from infinite continuity—speculations: Part 4, in The Science of reality: Is reality even definable? How the scientific model of the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) allows for the finite and the infinite. IQ Nexus J. 2019; 11: 28-37.
  142. Close ER, Neppe VM. The problem of determining the mass of the neutron: Section 7: In: Derivation and application of TRUE quantum calculus for the analysis of quantized reality. 2020.
  143. Neppe VM, Close ER. TDVP: a paradigm shift that works —how the Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm challenges conventional scientific thinking and explains reality. Telicom. 2014; 27: 24-42.
  144. Neppe VM, Close ER. Dimensions and dilemmas (Part 13A). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 115-117.
  145. Close ER, Neppe VM. Understanding TDVP through dimensions: chapter 5. IQ Nexus J. 2016; 8: 61-69.
  146. Close ER, Neppe VM. Support for the hypothesis of a 9-dimensional spin finite reality model (Part 7). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 33-35.
  147. Hecht E. How Einstein confirmed E=mc2. Am J Phy. 2011; 79: 591–600.
  148. Neppe VM, Close ER. Multidimensional time and 3S-3T-3C (Part 13-J). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 136-138.
  149. Neppe VM, Close ER. Time and Free-will: Section 5. In Free-will: Freedom of choice within limits. IQ Nexus J. 2018; 10: 31-45.
  150. Neppe VM, with Close ER. The need to refute: Why the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) entails far more than the Standard Model of Physics: 4D experience is far less thatn our 9D+ existence. IQNexus J. 2018; 4: 47-78.
  151. Smullyan R. Gödel's incompleteness theorems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1991.
  152. Morgart E. The theory of everything has nine dimensions: The sparkling diamond and the quanta jewel turn quantum physics and the nine-pronged world of consciousness—on its ear. USA Today Magazine. 2014; 66-68.
  153. Neppe VM, Close ER. Reality Begins with Consciousness (RBC) — Glimpses and Glossary 2nd Edition. Seattle, WA: Brainvoyage.com. 2014.
  154. Neppe VM, Close ER. The relevance of Free-will of the Neppe-Close models as reflected in Reality Begins with Consciousness: Section 4. In Free-will: Freedom of choice within limits. IQ Nexus J. 2018; 10: 23-31.
  155. Houran J. Entropy and environmental mystery: a parapsychological perspective. Percept Mot Skills. 2007; 105: 688-690. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18065094.
  156. Sturrock PA. A Bayesian maximum-entropy approach to hypothesis testing, for application to RNG and similar experiments. Journal of Scientific Exploration. 1997; 11: 181-192.
  157. May EC, P. SSJ, James CL. Shannon entropy as an intrinsic target property: Toward a reductionist model of anomolous cognition, in. The Parapsychological Association 37th Annual Convention. August 7-10, 1994 University of Amsterdam. Edited by Bierman, Dick J.1994.
  158. Neppe VM, Close ER. Special concepts in the finite and infinite anomalous process (Part 13). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 114-122.
  159. Neppe VM, Close ER. The infinite (Part 13B). IQNexus J. 2015; 7: 117-120.
  160. Neppe VM. Meaningful Evolution (‘ME’): Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) And Consciousness: A Refutation Of Darwinian Evolution (‘DE’) and a scientific addition or alternative to Intelligent Design (‘ID’): Part 3 In Meaningful Evolution, abiogenesis and life solved through gimmel: Translating from the infinite continuity to the discrete finite by applying the Neppe-Close Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP). IQNexus J. 2019; 11: 20-25.
  161. Neppe VM. Perspective: why ‘meaningful evolution’ is a formidable model of evolution: Part 8. In Meaningful Evolution, abiogenesis and life solved through gimmel: Translating from the infinite continuity to the discrete finite by applying the Neppe-Close Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP). IQNexus J. 2019; 11: 62-76.

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More