The Hubble Tension Interpretation in Terms of Gnomonic Holography
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Hubble tension—the discrepancy between early- and late-Universe measurements of the Hubble constant—remains an open problem in cosmology. This paper proposes a geometric interpretation of the Universe based on gnomonic holography, in which a Hubble-like parameter emerges naturally from the projection geometry of the 4D‑globe manifold´s 3D‑curved Riemannian hypersphere into Euclidean locally 3E‑flat space, rather than being introduced as an independent cosmological constant. Using the Planck matter-energy dencity fractions, the model predicts two characteristic gnomonic radii associated with the baryonic and dark sectors. Although these differ by only about 0.2%, the nonlinear reconstruction yields Hubble-like values of 71.63 and 67.04, closely matching the observed Hubble tension. The model also predicts an emergent timescale ratio of approximately 80.3 between the visible and dark sectors. Furthermore, it interprets the Big Bang as a phase transition of a primordial background energy field, conceptually similar to Hoyle’s phase-transition cosmology but derived from an entirely different geometric framework. Although exploratory, the proposed approach suggests that the Hubble tension may reflect an intrinsic property of cosmic geometry rather than new fundamental physics.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2026 Mullat JE.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Buchert T. Backreaction issues in relativistic cosmology and the dark energy debate. AIP Conf Proc. 2007;910:361‑80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2752486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2752486
Danilatos GD. Novel quantitative push gravity/field theory poised for verification. North Bondi (Australia): ESEM Research Laboratory; 2020. Available from: https://zenodo.org/records/18112197
Di Valentino E, et al. In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions. Class Quantum Grav. 2021;38:153001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d
Hoyle F. A new model for the expanding universe. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 1948;108:372‑82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/108.5.372
Hoyle F, Burbidge G, Narlikar JV. A quasi‑steady state cosmological model with creation of matter. Astrophys J. a.1993;410:437‑57. 5b. Hoyle F, Burbidge G, Narlikar JV. A different approach to cosmology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/172761
Mullat JE. Cosmology that contradicts Big Bang theory. Copenhagen (Denmark): Private Publishing Platform; 2026. p.161‑204. ISBN: 978‑9403‑67‑421‑6. Available from: https://www.datalaundering.com/download/CosmologyContradictsCover.pdf.
Planck Collaboration (Aghanim N, et al). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron Astrophys. 2020;641:A6.
Riess AG, Yuan W, Macri LM, Scolnic D, Brout D, Casertano S, et al. A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with km s−1 Mpc−1 uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES team. Astrophys J Lett. 2022;934:L7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.04510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b